| |
Chapter 6
PRELUDE TO MILITARY ATTACK AGAINST SANT BHINDRANWALE
It
had by now become clear that Indira Gandhi. clandestinely
aided by the Third Agency had created and fomented the
Punjab problem and turned it into seemingly unresolvable
crisis. A state of insecurity and instability was
deliberately created through the operations of the Super
Intelligence Agency. Through the same Agency a feeling of
mutual distrust between the Hindus and the Sikhs was
generated which led to disturbances of communal harmony
not only in Punjab but in the whole country. The Sikhs
were projected as communal, extremists, terrorists,
separatists and anti national. To disseminate this vicious
propaganda against the Sikhs, the Press, All India Radio
and TV. were pressed into service. This canard was
carried to every nook and corner of the country. The cry
of the Sikhs was drowned in the vast sea of this vicious
propaganda. Political atmosphere was surcharged to such
an extent that the Hindu Opposition Parties vied with one
another to denigrate the Sikhs and advocated for taking
military action against Sant Bhin-dranw ale and his
followers. Atal Bihari Bajpai, President of'BJP. Charan
Singh. President of the Lok Dal. leaders of both the
Communist Parties, which style themselves as secular but
basically they too are communal, and others were strong
votaries of taking military action against the militant
Sikhs. So much so Harchand Singh Longowal, Balwant Sin.gh
Ex-Minister, Surjit Singh Barnala. and some other Akali
leaders covertly supported the military action simply to
please the Centre and then gain political power, So all
Hindu Parties and the Akali traitors among the Sikhs cried
with one voice "attack the Golden Temple Complex and teach
a lesson to the militant Sikhs Now the psychological and
political atmosphere was ripe for Indira Gandhi to invade
the Golden Temple Complex. She went on the AIR and the TV
late in the evening of June 2. 1984 to address the nation.
She pretended that she had tried to resolve the Punjab
crisis but the Akalis. were using dilatory tactics. Her
address to the country and the world was a camouflage in
order to cover up her ill-conceived motives. Her motives
were clear because on June 1'. 1984 she had already
deployed at least seven Divisions of Armed Forces in
Punjab who had taken their predetermined positions the
same day. Her address to the nation, in fact, constituted
a blatant lie and was a threat to the Akalis that if they
failed to accept her dictate she would have her will by
use of force,
In
her broadcast she blamed the Akali leaders for not having
reached agreement though the stark fact was that it was
she who had resiled not once but thrice when the
agreements between the Akalis and her team of ministers
had been reached. Her statement that sale of tobacco.
liquor and meat had been banned in the demacrated areas in
the walled city ofAmritsar was a white lie. With regard to
the demand for enacting of All India Gurdwara Act she
stated that other states were being consulted. Mere
consultation does not amount to accepting the demands.
Similarly, her announcement that she would constitute a
Tribunal headed by a Supreme Court Judge to decide the
distribution of river waters dispute was a diplomatic
move which lacked sincerity. Her proposal to appoint a
Commission to decide the territorial dispute with regard
to Chandigarh. Abohar. Fazilka and other Punjabi speaking
areas, was a hollow announcement. The setting up of
Sarkaria Commission (R. S. Sarkaria was appointed as
one-man Commission to submit his report redefining
State-Centre relations) amounted to ditching the Anandpur
Sahib Resolution which has been the main demand of the
Akalis. ll was clear from her broadcast that she wanted to
lull the Akalis with sweet but hollow promises. Not a
single demand of the Akali Dal for which it had launched
Dharm Yudh Morcha in 1981 was accepted.
In a
clever move she blamed the moderate Akali leaders for
having lost their control over the Morcha. She chided them
that the terrorists, the anti-national elements and the
religious fanatics had gained the upper hand and it was
they who had been controlling the movement. This was a
reference made to Sant Bhindranwale and his followers.
Under such pretexts she launched military operation
against the Sikhs She found immediate lame excuse for
launching military offensive in the proposed call given
by the Akali Dal for blocking movement of grains from
Punjab to other States. Longowal intentionally gave this
call at the behest of the Centre so that Indira Gandhi
could justify her ill-designed military action. Did she
give the Akali leaders a single day to reconsider their
threatened agitation proposed to be launched from 3rd June
onwards? It is pertinent to note that the army had clamped
curfew in whole of the Punjab on 3rd June and enforced it
so strictly that whole life in Punjab came to a stand
still. How the Akalis under such critical conditions could
have obstructed running of trains? It was clear that the
military curfew had completely thwarted the threatened
Rail-Roko agitation. Where was, then, the justification
for Indira Gandhi to resort to brutal military action?
Any how she found an excuse to take action against Sant
Bhindranwale and his followers.
Her
closing words in the broadcast that "Don't shed blood,
shed hatred" were likened to the Devil quoting scriptures.
It was Indira Gandhi who shed blood of the Sikhs and
spread hatred against them and not the vice versa.
|
|